Response to letter regarding article, "Prosthesis-patient mismatch in bovine pericardial aortic valves: evaluation using 3 different modalities and associated medium-term outcomes".

نویسندگان

  • Jacob Chacko
  • Asimul H Ansari
  • Patrick M McCarthy
  • Sukhit C Malaisrie
  • Adin-Cristian Andrei
  • Zhi Li
  • Richard Lee
  • Edwin McGee
  • Robert O Bonow
  • Jyothy J Puthumana
چکیده

BACKGROUND The prevalence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and its impact on survival after aortic valve replacement have not been clearly defined. Historically, the presence of PPM was identified from postoperative echocardiograms or preoperative manufacturer-provided charts, resulting in wide discrepancies. The 2009 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines proposed an algorithmic approach to calculate PPM. This study compared PPM prevalence and its impact on survival using 3 modalities: (1) the ASE guidelines-suggested algorithm (ASE PPM); (2) the manufacturer-provided charts (M PPM); and (3) the echocardiographically measured, body surface area-indexed, effective orifice area (EOAi PPM) measurement. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 614 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with bovine pericardial valves from 2004 to 2009 and had normal preoperative systolic function. EOAi PPM was severe if EOAi was ≤ 0.60 cm(2)/m(2), moderate if EOAi was 0.60 to 0.85 cm(2)/m(2), and absent (none) if EOAi was ≥ 0.85 cm(2)/m(2). ASE PPM was severe in 22 (3.6%), moderate in 6 (1%), and absent (none) in 586 (95.4%). ASE PPM was similar to manufacturer-provided PPM (P=1.00). ASE PPM differed significantly from EOAi PPM (P<0.001), which identified severe mismatch in 170 (29.7%), moderate in 191 (33.4%), and absent (none) in 211 patients (36.9%). Irrespective of the PPM classification method, PPM did not adversely affect midterm survival (average follow-up, 4.1 ± 1.8 years; median, 3.9 years; range, 0.01-8 years). There were no reoperations for PPM. CONCLUSIONS In patients with normal systolic function undergoing bovine pericardial aortic valve replacement, the prevalence of PPM using the algorithmic-ASE approach was low and correlated well with manufacturer-provided PPM. Independent of the method of PPM assessment, PPM was not associated with medium-term mortality.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Letter by House et al regarding article, "Prosthesis-patient mismatch in bovine pericardial aortic valves: evaluation using 3 different modalities and associated medium-term outcomes".

The proverbial gold standard for evaluating prosthesis-patient mis-match (PPM) is the effective orifice area index. This is attributable to the inverse relationship that exists between the effective orifice area index and mean gradient. 1 Other tools have been promoted to identify PPM but have not withstood scrutiny. 1 In a recent edition of Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, Chacko et al 2 p...

متن کامل

Long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: effect of patient age.

Pericardial bioprosthetic heart valves were introduced into clinical practice more than 30 years ago (1). Unfortunately, the long-term results were initially disappointing, particularly with regard to the limited durability of the prosthesis (2,3). Clinical use of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial (CEp) valve started in 1981, and a variety of new techniques of valve construction and anti-calci...

متن کامل

eComment. The current bioprosthesis of choice for aortic valve replacements.

ference in postoperative aortic valve area, maximum velocity across the valve and mortality. Pelletier et al. [8] performed a cohort study comparing 878 CE porcine and 715 Ionescu-Shiley, CE and Mitroflow bovine valves in AVR, MVR or MR from 1976–88. It showed similar late survival rates and clinical improvement. However, the freedom from all valve-related complications was significantly better...

متن کامل

Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to quantify the relationship between prosthesis size adjusted for patient size (prosthesis-patient size) and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. METHODS Data from nine representative sources on 13,258 aortic valve replacements provided 69,780 patient-years of follow-up (mean 5.3 +/- 4.7 years), with reliable survival estimates to 15 years. Pr...

متن کامل

Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES This prospective-randomized study investigated the effect of aortic valve design and patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) on coronary flow reserve (CFR) after mechanical or biological aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). BACKGROUND Coronary flow reserve may be an important parameter of long-term survival after AVR in patients with AS. Reduced CFR may c...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging

دوره 7 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013